For EAM / GIS Technical Leads
Another planning tool that wants a copy of your master data? No.
You've spent years getting functional locations, equipment records and GIS features to something like agreement. The last thing you need is a fourth system of record. AIPP is clean-core by architecture, not by brochure: released APIs, destination-based connectivity, and a federated mode where S/4 stays the master.
"Every vendor says 'seamless SAP integration'. Then you read the spec and it's a nightly CSV into their proprietary store, a custom RFC they want installed in the core, and a data model with no keys back to your functional locations. Six months later you own two registers that disagree."
— The integration review you've done a dozen times. Here's how ours reads differently.The architecture, stated precisely
Straight answers to the questions you'll ask: SAP certification — ICC submission prepared, 13/13 technical conformance verified, certificate pending SAP's review. Write-back to S/4 — deliberately not in v1; AIPP reads, plans and exports, and delivery integration (PM/PS work order handoff) is on the published roadmap. Load ceiling — in-memory optimisation is guarded at 50k assets per scope; DB push-down beyond that is roadmap.
In the demo
What you'd actually inspect
The federate switch
Connect / Load Data → Direct S/4 with the federate checkbox. Then read a federated record and verify the master attributes aren't persisted. Bring your own scepticism.
$metadata and the model
The full OData model is yours to walk — entities, keys, the flat KPI columns, the change-log. No black-box tables.
Failure modes live
Point it at a missing destination, feed it dirty CSV, watch the 424s, the DQ flags and the auto-heal normalisation do their jobs.
Bring your integration checklist
A 60-minute technical session: architecture, data model, security posture, failure modes — with the product live, not slides.