The solution
A decision layer over the asset system you already run.
AIPP ranks your renewal programme against a real budget, cites the instrument behind every score, and refuses to score an asset the evidence does not support. It is not an EAM, not a work-order system and not a replacement for your register — it is the layer that turns what you already hold into a decision you can defend.
The problem, in one paragraph
Everybody can rank assets. Almost nobody can defend the ranking.
Your register is incomplete, and it always will be. Some assets have never been inspected. Some carry a replacement cost from a valuation four years old. Most tools handle that by filling the gap — a default curve, a class average, a zero — and returning a clean, complete, confident list. Then an auditor asks why one asset was renewed and another deferred, and the honest answer is that nobody knows, because the number that decided it was invented.
Four verbs
The claim, and how you check each part of it
You should not take any of this on trust. Each verb below has a test you can run on your own data in an afternoon.
Over the system you already run
The test: point it at your register — an export will do. If it demands a migration off your EAM, GIS or finance ledger before it produces anything, the claim is false.
Twelve fields. Two of them required.
Ranks against a real budget constraint
The test: set a budget below what the need requires. A tool that returns the same list in the same order, only shorter, is sorting rather than optimising.
Multi-year, treatment-aware, deferral priced.
Cites the governing instrument
The test: open any score and ask what it answers to. The instrument should be named, with whether it is implemented or merely referenced stated on the same screen.
108 instruments, 91 classes mapped.
Refuses what the evidence will not support
The test: load your worst class. If everything comes back scored and the ranking looks clean, it is defaulting your gaps — and you have learnt more from that than from any demo.
Unranked, with the reason named per criterion.
Why it works across industries
Twelve fields is a workshop. An EAM migration is two years.
A decision layer does not need work orders, stores, labour, permits or any of the machinery that makes asset-system replacements take years. It needs to know what the asset is, how old it is, what it would cost to replace, what condition it is in, and what happens if it fails. Every asset system on earth holds those, under different names. That is the whole reason this can be configured for eleven industries rather than rebuilt for each.
Any system of record
Thirteen systems mapped onto the same twelve fields, and a generic path for anything not named. Each map states how well it is actually known — vendor-published, observed in the field, or built from your instance in the first workshop. We do not invent a schema nobody publishes.
Any deployment
Four targets running identical engines: SAP BTP, a portable container, your own cloud account, or fully air-gapped. The database driver and the identity provider are the only substitutions, so no target is a lock-in and the exit is a redeploy rather than a rewrite.
Any condition scale
Converted on published bands rather than stretched linearly — including the ones that run backwards, where a high grade means a good asset. Getting that wrong ranks your healthiest assets first, and it is the most common error in the category.
The cycle
What a planning year looks like
Bring what you have
A spreadsheet, an API, or a live read from your system of record. Incomplete records are loaded, not rejected — then scored for quality so you know which assets you cannot yet decide about. The parser handles what a real export actually contains: the wrong encoding, the wrong delimiter, the placeholder text, the totals row at the bottom. It tells you what it did rather than doing it silently.
Score, and decline
Risk and consequence per class, on your scale, against the instrument that governs it. Weights are sliders your engineers own, not our opinion. Assets without the evidence come back unranked with the missing criteria named — that list is your data-collection plan, priced.
Make the budget bite
Multi-year, treatment-aware, with escalation and risk growth priced on everything you defer. Save scenarios, compare them side by side, endorse one. Doing nothing gets a number.
Produce the evidence
Report packs generated from the same scored data, every figure traceable to the row it came from. Each decision run is versioned and reproducible, and the change ledger can be sealed so a row cannot be quietly edited afterwards.
What we will not claim
The limits, before you find them
No install base yet
This is a young product. If your procurement weights reference customers heavily — and it should — that is a real and reasonable reason to rank us lower. We price the pilot to carry that risk rather than argue you out of it.
Representative coefficients
The shipped failure rates and intervals are AIPP representative figures, labelled as such everywhere they appear. They are a starting point. The product is worth materially more after a calibration cycle on your data than before one.
Licensed tables are not included
Where a method's coefficients belong to the body that publishes it, the form ships and the tables do not. You bring them, or your licence does. No amount of engineering changes that, and a vendor who implies otherwise is telling you something.
It is not an EAM
AIPP decides what to fund and defends it. It is not a work-order system, not a mobile inspection app and not a records management system. Integrating with those is a project, not a checkbox.
On security and certification: no penetration test, no SOC 2, no ISO 27001 and no IRAP assessment. They are sequenced after first revenue and we will not claim any of them until they are issued. What compensates today: your data can stay inside your own cloud account or entirely off the network, the export is unrestricted, and there is no exit fee.
Where to start
One class. The one you trust least.
Not a trial and not a procurement. Bring one export of the asset class with the missing condition data and the costs nobody has revalued. A fixed-fee pilot, payable on acceptance: if the evidence pack is not audit-ready, it is not payable.
See what it refuses to tell you
That is the part worth twenty minutes of your time. Everything else in this category looks the same on a slide.