For CFOs · COOs · CIOs

Your renewal program is a nine-figure decision made in a spreadsheet.

The capital works program is usually the largest discretionary allocation your organisation makes — and in most asset-intensive organisations it is still assembled by hand, defended by assertion, and re-litigated every cycle. AIPP makes it an interrogatable, auditable decision.

Executive briefing →The business case ↓

"When I ask why this project is in the program and that one isn't, I get a confident answer that changes depending on who I ask. I'm signing a capital envelope I can't decompose — and when the regulator or the audit committee asks the same question, that's my name on the answer."

— The exposure, stated plainly. AIPP exists to close it.

The business case, in your terms

capital efficiencyA monetised value model ranks every candidate by value per dollar across risk, service, safety and financial measures — and the efficient frontier shows exactly where additional budget stops buying meaningful risk reduction. That knee in the curve is usually worth more than the software costs.

deferral, pricedEvery deferred project carries a computed cost: escalation plus risk growth, year by year. "Do nothing" stops being free in your board papers — which changes the conversation with council, the board and the regulator.

risk, quantifiedMonte-Carlo simulation over modelled failure probabilities gives you expected loss, VaR₉₀ and CVaR₉₀ (expected shortfall) of modelled risk-exposure, with its assumptions stated (independent failures by default; a common-shock option for correlated events) — the difference between "we think it's risky" and a number your audit committee can minute.

roiA conservative, attributable model: a modest better-targeting gain on the risk value in your portfolio, plus the consulting spend a self-service model replaces, against a published annual platform cost. We publish the recurring multiple and the year-1 multiple as two separate numbers — the one-time consulting you avoid is never annualised into the recurring figure — and every constant in the calculation is exposed for your finance team to challenge and re-run with your numbers. We'd rather you interrogate it than believe it.

it strategyClean-core on the SAP platform you already own. No new EAM ecosystem, no strategic capability handed to a competitor of your core vendor, no 6–18 month implementation program on the balance sheet. Live in about 30 days.

governanceApproval workflows, frozen plan baselines, year-on-year diffs and hash-sealed evidence packs mean the decision trail exists before anyone asks for it — audit preparation as a by-product of operating.

⚖

What your risk committee should know: we are an early-stage vendor. The mitigation is structural — fixed-fee pay-on-acceptance pilot, deployment into your own SAP tenancy, published pricing, no lock-in, and your data and evidence packs are yours on exit. The downside is bounded at the pilot fee; the upside is a permanently defensible capital program.

The 15-minute briefing

What we show an executive, in order

One number, interrogated

The top-ranked project's score, decomposed live — condition, consequence, hazard, data confidence — down to the source records. The answer to "why this one?"

The envelope conversation

The efficient frontier on a real portfolio: what each budget level buys in risk addressed, and where returns flatten. Your next budget discussion, on one chart.

The audit answer

A frozen baseline diffed against the draft plan — what moved and why — and a sealed evidence pack your auditors can verify independently.

Bring your CFO and your Director of Infrastructure to the same meeting

Thirty minutes, live product, your questions. If it doesn't change how you think about the capital program, that's the end of it.

Book the briefing →Published pricing