Industries · Airports & aviation
Airports & aviation
An airport has a runway with a PCI survey, a terminal with a building condition report and a capital plan that has to fit around a single overnight closure window each week.
Who this is for
Three people, one budget argument
Airside asset manager
Owns the plan and answers for it. Everything on screen is built to make that week easier.
Terminal facilities manager
Holds the budget line and carries the valuation. Cares about defensibility before features.
Head of infrastructure
Signs, and is the one asked the awkward question in public. Needs one page, not a tour.
Asset classes
What AIPP scores in this industry
Configured for this industry out of the box: condition on the ASTM_D5340_PCI scale, the AVIATION weighting profile, budget shown as Airside + terminal capital plan, and the instruments it answers to (ASTM_D5340, ICAO_CASA139, FAA_AC150, ASTM_E2018) named on every score. All of it is yours to change — the weights are sliders, not our opinion.
The honest bit
3 of 18 assets will not score
That is the demo register for this industry, and the gaps are deliberate. AIPP refuses to rank an asset the evidence does not support — it will not apply a curve, a zero or a middle grade to a thing nobody has inspected. 17% of this register comes back unranked, with the reason named.
3 of 18 assets carry NO condition evidence and NO age. That is deliberate. A demo register where everything scores teaches a prospect nothing about what happens to the two-thirds of their own register that will not — and it is exactly where most tools quietly invent a zero. Open the demo on these.
How it runs
From export to defensible programme
Airfield PCI loads on D5340 bands; the terminal loads on its building condition survey. The two are never pooled.
Airside safety and regulatory obligation outrank terminal amenity, which is the trade-off an airport actually makes.
Closure windows constrain delivery as tightly as money, and the optimiser respects both.
The plan reports what will not fit in the available night windows even if funded.
The pack separates regulatory obligation from commercial improvement.
What you will see
The screens that matter here
Fair questions
What this industry actually asks us
Do you handle PCN/ACN pavement strength?
No. Strength rating is an engineering assessment AIPP consumes, not one it produces.
Our terminal is leased in parts.
Ownership and responsibility load as attributes, and the plan can be filtered to what you actually fund.
Is CASA MOS 139 built in?
Referenced, with its vocabulary carried. Conformance assessment is not performed and is not claimed.
Run it on your own worst class
Bring one export — the class with the missing condition data and the costs from 2019. If AIPP tells you the truth about it in twenty minutes, that is worth a conversation. If it scores everything and looks clean, tell us so.